REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP STATEMENT
ON SPECIAL SESSION BUDGET VOTE
SANTA FE – Following the late night floor vote of House Bill 2, the budget bill, House Republican Leadership issued the following statement:
###
REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP STATEMENT
ON SPECIAL SESSION BUDGET VOTE
SANTA FE – Following the late night floor vote of House Bill 2, the budget bill, House Republican Leadership issued the following statement:
###
REP. ROCH INTRODUCES COST-SAVING
AMENDMENT TO STATE BUDGET
Amendment eliminates more than 4000 vacant state jobs
SANTA FE, NM—State Representative Dennis Roch (R-Tucumcari) introduced an amendment to House Bill 2, the General Appropriations Act, which would have de-authorized more than four thousand vacant positions in state government.
“Citizens throughout New Mexico should not be asked to shoulder additional tax burdens,” Roch said during the debate on the amendment, “when taxpayer dollars continue to fund empty desks in Santa Fe.”
The amendment, which was tabled on a nearly party-line vote, would have eliminated thousands of positions. The consequential savings could have closed much of the estimated $300 million gap between state revenue and state spending.
“New Mexico is not undertaxed; it continues to overspend,” said Roch. “It’s unfortunate that some legislators prefer to make taxpayers pick up the cost of the state’s overspending.”
###
House Republican Leadership Comments on the 49th Legislative Session
Santa Fe – Today in response to the conclusion of the 49th New Mexico Legislative Session, the House Republican leaders offered the following statements.
“We spent more than $4.9 million for a 30-day session when our obligation was to pass a balanced budget. The House passed a budget with a deficit of $310 million and had a budget returned from the Senate with a $100 million deficit. The people of New Mexico were short changed with this session and will end up paying more than $50,000 a day for a special session,” said House Republican Leader Tom Taylor.
“Rather than agree to bad legislation just so we could go home, Republicans will continue to be a voice for sensible solutions: leaner government, lower taxes, fewer unnecessary regulations,” said House Republican Whip Keith Gardner.
“Let’s remember that cuts are not the goal, revenue is the goal. The only way we can increase our revenue is to make cuts, avoid raising taxes, and let the economy bloom again,” said House Republican Caucus Leader Anna Crook.
The following op-ed appeared today in the Albuquerque Journal under the heading, “Permanent Fixes Needed to Reconcile State Budget,” and is offered for submission to all media.
Budget Transcends Political Boundaries
Submitted by the 49th New Mexico State Legislature House Republicans
With so much at stake and so little time left in the 49th New Mexico Legislative Session, we would like to lift the curtain on how the budget process is unfolding. The story this year has so far been a dramatic one as we and our Democrat colleagues clashed, debated, maneuvered, and finally come together in an effort to allow the budget to transcend political boundaries.
When this session began, New Mexico had a budget deficit for the upcoming fiscal year of $600 million. The Legislative Finance Committee proposed a budget to the House Appropriations and Finance Committee that would reduce that deficit to $200 million. Rather than taking that recommendation and working to scale it back even further, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee added $90 million to it, creating a total deficit of $310 million with most of the balance temporary dollars.
The possibility of raiding our already depleted rainy day funds permeated budget discussions despite figures that proved they should be left alone to replenish. Once a thriving 13% of recurring appropriations, the state reserves have been reduced to 2.5% of recurring appropriations, or about $133 million.
It was clear from the beginning that the chances of receiving large amounts of temporary additional federal money is slim. The $23 million of federal money that is headed our way for education and the federal funding for the Medicaid program that will allow New Mexico to reduce general fund appropriations by $70 million are temporary. We will have to replace them next year.
A few weeks ago, Rep. Ken Martinez extended a hollow invitation when he said, “Even if you [the House Republicans] will not vote for any type of revenue enhancement I think you can have a hand in the policy making by just giving us your good ideas.”
In fact we had provided the powerful House Rules Committee that is controlled by Democrats ten of our “good ideas” in the form of bills that would institute responsible and necessary budget cuts that are not temporary. All of these bills were voted down, eliminating any chance of debate, testimony from New Mexicans around the state, and other legislative action that is vital to making responsible budget decisions.
It appeared that Democrats had chosen taxes increases as their solution to this enormous budget mess. They seemed oblivious to the reality that increased taxes would only halt job creation by compelling the businesses and individuals that pay these taxes to reduce the number of their employees, curtail any plans to expand, or move out of state to compensate for the new taxes they have to pay.
Fortunately, Friday’s budget and tax votes indicated a shift in thinking among some of the House Democrats. The bi-partisan votes indicate an abandonment of party-line agenda in favor of objective analysis. Eight Democrats voted against HB9, a bill to impose a surtax for three years on certain personal income, making the margin of victory for the bill only four votes. Democrat and Republican opposition to HB270, a bill to take away itemized tax deductions, caused the bill to fail 34 to 33, with ten Democrat votes against it.
There are still some large flaws in our pending budget and tax legislation. For instance, there are a lot of temporary dollars in the six main House budget bills. Temporary tax increases are burdensome because they are tax increases that later go away and leave government thirsty. They also add a variable to the fiscal landscape and make it more difficult for individuals, families, and businesses to plan. Another problem is that we are simply spending too much and must further decrease our fiscal year 2011 expenditures.
In the face of great challenges, it is important to remember that the budget process is only half over. As the budget bill moves to the Senate, we hope the tax and spend liberals will recognize the long term ramifications of this problem and help create permanent solutions rather than temporary fixes.
| website: http://www.nmhousegop.com/ |
twitter
|
| FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 28, 2010 |
CONTACT: (505) 216-6342 |
The House passed the budget. WHAT NEXT?
Santa Fe – Upon the passage of the FY2011 New Mexico State Budget (HB2), Rep. Tom Taylor (San Juan) and Rep. Keith Gardner (Chaves, Eddy, Lea, Roosevelt) issued the following statements.
“It is irresponsible for the House to pass the budget with a $310 million deficit built in. It is even more irresponsible to address that reduction through tax increases to New Mexico’s hardworking families. This session, Republicans introduced numerous measures to cut costs to taxpayers and unfortunately all of them were voted down by Democrats,” said Republican Leader Tom Taylor.
“To compound the problem, there are a lot of temporary dollars in this bill. Temporary tax increases are burdensome because they are tax increases that later go away and leave government thirsty. They are also burdensome because they add a variable to the landscape and make it more difficult for individuals, families, and businesses to plan. For someone who looks beyond the tip of their nose, it is clear that the legislature is going to have to revisit these same issues next year unless we solve this problem now,” Taylor continued.
“We entered this session with a $200 million defecit and in a little under a month it has grown to $310 million. Fortunately, there is still time to fix this problem. We are only done with the first half of the budget process,” said House Republican Whip Keith Gardner. “As the budget bill moves to the Senate, we are counting on our colleagues there pick up the torch of budget savings and responsible fiscal policy. We must avoid raising taxes and instead make careful spending cuts.”
###
website:http://www.nmhousegop.com/ twitter: http://www.twitter.com/nmhousegop
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT:
February 3, 2010
New Mexico House Republicans WHAT: Republican House Representatives will be available for comment regarding the FY2011 budget and their strategy for the second half of the 49th New Mexico Legislative Session. WHEN: Wednesday, February 3, 2010 - Immediately following the vote on the FY2011 budget (HB2) WHERE: Interested media should call (505) 216-6342 or visit the Republican House Leadership Office, Room 125, The Roundhouse, to request interviews with specific Republican House Representatives. The leadership office will locate representatives and connect them with inquiring reporters. Representatives will be available for phone and in-person interviews. DETAILS: All electronic, print, radio, and TV media are welcome to attend. No advance notice is necessary. ###
*** Media Availability ***
| website: http://www.nmhousegop.com/ | |
| FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: February 1, 2010 |
CONTACT: (505) 216-6342 |
The following editorial appeared in the Albuquerque Journal on January 29, 2010 under the heading “N.M. Taxpayers Didn’t Create, Can’t Fix, Budget Mess,” and is offered for submission to all media.
Budget Business By Republican House Whip Keith Gardner If you think that this legislative session is different from all of the others, you are correct. This year the state legislature will be faced with New Mexico’s most serious budget crisis in our state’s history. As we take on this problem, it is important to keep in mind some key points. We are not just tackling this year’s crisis, we have last year’s budget problems to deal with as well. We are currently facing a roughly 600 million deficit between FY2010 and FY2011. Raising taxes is not the answer. Unemployment remains high in New Mexico, while tax revenues have declined since 2008. This cycle of economic downturn will not be fixed by raising taxes. It is unfair to New Mexico working families to raise taxes. Raising taxes would only offer momentary relief to the state treasury before the businesses and individuals that paid the new taxes reduce the number of their employees, curtail any plans to expand, or move out of state to compensate for the new taxes they have to pay. New Mexicans already carry a heavy tax burden when compared to other Rocky Mountain states. Increasing taxes now will likely discourage future business development and job creation and cause the recession to last even longer in New Mexico. The Richardson/Denish administration proposed to raise taxes “temporarily.” The idea of a $200 million temporary tax increase has been circulating the Capitol as a solution to bring the budget into balance. In fact, if history is any indication, these taxes would very likely not be temporary or result in a decrease in the budget deficit. Afterall, there is nothing more permanent than a temporary tax. To solve our budget problems we are going to have to cut out all extraneous spending. Remember, the budget is not in bad shape only because of the economy, the budget is in bad shape because of overspending. Between FY 2003 and FY 2009, state government spending increased by nearly 53 percent and the number of budgeted state employees grew by 27 percent. Today, for every 100 private sector jobs in New Mexico, there are 25 state and local jobs. Again, our neighboring states are more cost conscious than we are. In Oklahoma there are only 22 state and local jobs for every 100 private sector jobs. In Texas there are 17, and Utah, Colorado, and Arizona each have only 16. This session, we must halt this trend and reverse it. As a businessperson as well as a legislator who cares about jobs, I maintain we must also resist over-regulation. One example is the Pit Rule, which has damaged our oil and gas industry by increasing the cost of drilling a well. The license fees that the Richardson/Denish administration increased last year are another example. License fees have the same affect as taxes. In addition, they are a hassle, and if implemented incorrectly they can burden businesses with ambiguous liability that ranges from annoying to frightening. We must limit business regulation to just essential laws that will reform legitimate, existing problems and take antiquated and unnecessary laws regarding commerce off the books. We as legislators need to be about the business of making it easier to do business in New Mexico. It’s quite clear that New Mexico’s current budget problems were not the result of taxpayers being asked to pay too little, but rather a state government that spends too much, mismanages much of what it does spend, and creates a hostile environment for business and job creation. Instead of considering ill-conceived tax increases and over-regulation, my colleagues and I must take a hard look at how state services are delivered and implement fundamental changes in the way state government operates.
Comments
Post has no comments.